In the wake of the massive shift in politics that was the rise of Nationalism, new frameworks through which to view the American political landscape seem necessary.
Ironically, the ADL just released it’s Alt-Right vs. Alt-Lite article as I was writing this. Like everything from the ADL and their ilk, it’s inaccurate, so hopefully this will provide a better picture for sympathetic eyes. This list is entirely intuitive, based solely on my opinion after about five years of observing politics from the right. It is written primarily for those sympathetic to White interests, and is intended to combat disinformation from the Left and most importantly, the Alt-Lite.
A Meta-Group engages in the collective pursuit of interests that run deeper than ideology. Meta-Group designations have been given to ideologies below upon which the Meta-Group exerts significant influence, though this does not necessarily imply total domination. Usually the Meta-Group manipulates policy to its benefit, or is the driving force behind policies. Feminism has been included because the promotion of female-empowerment has had a radical effect on policy regarding subjects such as immigration, multiculturalism, and even economics.
Identitarians (ID): Either minorities attacking white interests, or whites attacking their own interests on minorities’ behalf.
Zionists (ZIO): Jews and non-Jews who actively pursue Jewish interests on behalf of Israel and the Diaspora, almost exclusively to the detriment of White interests.
Alt-Right (AR): Whites explicitly pursuing their own racial interests.
Feminism (F): Men and women alike who support empowerment of females in private and public life to rectify perceived injustices, past and present.
Disputed (DIS): The group itself is a significant battleground, either between identity meta-groups, or resistance to meta-group influence.
A note on Nihilism:
I debated whether or not to include this group, but in the end I realized they might be the largest group of all. They represent Americans who do not meaningfully subscribe to political ideologies or philosophies. Some common reasons are poor education, selfishness, exhaustion, and genuine nihilism resulting from total disillusionment with the modern world.
Prominent Examples: This group includes the least intellectual members of the entertainment industry, and some hedonistic elites. They usually refrain from constant political commentary, but will repeat the socially acceptable liberal talking-points when asked or occasionally when seeking approval. They also serve as a pool to be drawn upon for radicalization. For example, a pop-star could radicalize out of pressure from groups like BLM.
Hoi Polloi: Outside of the wealthiest circles, this non-ideology describes a significant portion of middle to upper class millennials and gen-x’ers. They are pleasure seekers, the kinds you will see at any American music festival, wearing flower-crowns, telling the rest of the world they “just need to get along”. Surely, if everyone could afford to buy a lifetime supply ecstasy tablets with daddy’s money, tolerance would come as easily to the rest of us. This also includes a lot of white collar wage slaves who kill time with alcohol and sports, and support leftist causes for social reasons/survival, and Blacks in the ghetto who aren’t politically engaged enough to even be considered Neoliberal.
Demographics: White and Black.
Growth Potential: Maintaining
Media Sample: MTV, VICE
Threat to White Interests: High, they serve as conduits of anti-white and degenerate messaging. Support mass immigration.
Prominent Examples: I had difficulty finding a well-known example of this group that readers outside of the millennial and z generations would know, as it is a recently emerging phenomenon. They are children of hyper-globalism, disaffected with modern life who express themselves in highly-stylized, post-modern art forms. For this reason their art has occasionally been appropriated and adapted by the Alt-Right and far left, both ironically and seriously.
Hoi Polloi: This group would best describe people who actively reject all conventional ideologies and political identity. This includes a large share of generation Z, who have found the traditional definitions of right and left to ring hollow. They are at extreme risk for hard drug abuse, suicide, and anti-social behavior due to alienation, poor prospects, and a fragmentation of identity. Despite all of this, they are accessible for recruitment by the Alt-Right via offerings of a purpose couched in aesthetics and irony that naturally appeal to them. Some of them are also apolitical trolls who employ Alt-Right artillery from time to time, there is significant overlap.
Demographics: Difficult to tell.
Growth Potential: High
Media Sample: N/A
Threat to White Interests: Little to none. Breeds complacency.
Prominent Examples: Many comedians and personalities, such as Anthony Cumia, fall into this category. They are generally apolitical white American males, from late gen-X to boomers. Leftist and globalist policies frustrate and annoy them on a visceral, instinctual level, thus they serve merely as critics and provide no solutions nor serious analysis. This obviously isn’t a fault for entertainers, and their frequent run-ins with PC-police enlist them as rallying points for the right, and sometimes even as martyrs. When pushed far enough they will speak out more honestly than anyone else at their level of fame.
Hoi Polloi: As mentioned above, this group could be used to describe many boomer and late gen-X’er white males just trying to get by in an increasingly hostile culture. They’re typically middle-class guys who don’t like HR telling them what to do, will be honest about race in private, and have a natural aversion to deviancy. Most feel an intense nostalgia for the tail-end of American sanity and prosperity they came of age in. Depending on religious background, class, and region they will have varying opinions on economics and policy, and can often be defined as single-issue voters. They are susceptible to getting lost in the world of conspiracy in an attempt to explain the dramatic shifts in culture experienced in their lifetimes. In the end I only classify them as nihilists because these shifts and accompanying censorship have exhausted them. This designation could also describe young nihilists drifting to the right.
Demographics: Overwhelmingly White with some middle-class, older minorities. High male over-representation.
Growth Potential: Declining
Media Sample: Compound Media, Joe Rogan Show
Threat to White Interests: None, fair-weather allies. Breeds complacency.
Prominent Examples: This designation specifically refers to the foot-soldiers of the elite radicals (covered below). None are prominent, though Antifa is a well-known manifestation.
Hoi Polloi: In the 90s and early 2000s this group was more ideologically defined, taking their cues from radical elites like Noam Chomsky. They were a relatively fringe element, usually only found at anti-war demonstrations, once a year protesting capitalism at the G20, or exploiting random flash-points over police-brutality and race. Things got messy and a lot bigger as the Nationalist Right became prominent in recent years, and leftist radicals suddenly found themselves aligned with Neoliberals on issues of borders and multiculturalism. Now that radical Leftist politics have become acceptable in polite society, their ranks have swelled.
Though many claim they are fighting for the marginalized, the borderless world they seek will only serve to further empower those exploiting workers while capitalism remains intact. Obviously, working to abolish borders with the most powerful forces on earth is an easier prospect than dismantling those forces, thus anti-capitalism and anti-statism have taken a back seat to immigration and issues of social justice. White members either believe in a global multicultural utopia, or they accept arguments of white-replacement and believe they deserve extinction. There is reasonable speculation that elite internationalists are funding factions of this group. Some SJWs hold the extreme beliefs required to belong to this group.
Demographics: Majority white, but growing minority presence.
Growth Potential: High
Media Sample: It’s Going Down, Anarchist Subreddits
Threat to White Interests: Moderate, threatening on a physical level, cause censorship, enforce will of the elite, but bad optics for the left. Distracts allies. Support mass immigration.
Prominent Examples: Perhaps the most notable of this class are authors like Noam Chomsky, the filmmaker Michael Moore, and the politician Jeremy Corbin in Eruope. They have been called champagne socialists, ivory-tower radicals, etc. but the main characteristic is a dissociation between ideology and lifestyle. Ironically they most closely resemble genuine Communists, as the party-elite mixed with international high society and enjoyed unchecked privilege under the Soviet regime. Most left wing celebrities oscillate between this group and Neoliberalism depending on what is in fashion and their current mood. Calls for radical violence against the state and political opponents have become common place in the Trump era, so there is significant overlap in high-society. Important figures will sometimes criticize Neoliberals for their economic policies in order to remain relevant, but the alliance stands. The STEM branch of this group focuses on producing information to validate Neoliberal policy on climate change.
Hoi Polloi: Almost entirely controlled by Boomers, now passing the torch to Millennials, this group includes radicals from all over the upper-middle-class, but perhaps most important are the professors. A powerful alliance is formed with this group supplying ideology to Neoliberal apparatuses in government and the corporate world, who in turn reciprocate with funding and legitimacy. They also have a symbiotic relationship with their Radical followers, to whom they disseminate their ideas, which Radicals enforce through lateral censorship and violence/the threat of violence. This is where the majority of cutting-edge SJW causes, such as gender and race theory, are manufactured.
Demographics: Whites. Token minorities. High Jewish over-representation.
Growth Potential: Maintaining
Threat to White Interests: High, manufacture anti-White narratives, influence over education of Whites, influence over powerful figures. Support mass immigration.
Prominent Examples: Almost every liberal American politician falls into this category, as lesser subsets of Democrats have been assimilated. For them, social issues are a means to an end, thus they are as culturally liberal as their constituencies will allow. They are internationalist in the extreme, supporting open-borders, barely-restricted free-trade, and are hawkish on Israel, Russia, and war in general. The most egregious war crimes, such as funding terrorists and regime change, are their geopolitical bread and butter. They allow Leftist Radicals to operate unchecked, and even bring them to the table. They are using immigration to manipulate demographics for the sake of votes for themselves and cheap labor for their donors and elite supporters. What has been termed the Deepstate consists of Neoliberal appointees and employees from the pre-Trump era. Much of the chattering classes, journalists, and less radical academics, often seeking status or moral superiority, fall into this category.
Hoi Polloi: These individuals make up the vast majority of the left’s base. They are made up of all generations, majority female, and Whites are usually middle to upper-class. Due to their lack of interest in issues outside of social-welfare and social justice, many minorities could be considered Neoliberals. The drones of the managerial state such as government employees, are almost without exception, Neoliberal. Most SJWs could be considered Neoliberal for their lack of concern for economics and silence on the left’s new hawkish stances.
Demographics: White, minority over-representation. Female over-representation.
Growth Potential: High, count most immigrants as Neoliberals
Media Sample: CNN, The Atlantic, Buzzfeed, HuffPo, Mic, most mainstream outlets.
Threat to White Interests: The most powerful, and arguably greatest threat of all. Support mass immigration.
Prominent Examples: Everyone who lived through the Bush-era knows this group and understands their destructiveness as a political class. They are often socially conservative, preying on single-issue voters, anti-social welfare, hawkish, and soft on illegal immigration. Recently they have even begun to cave on social issues, going so far as counting homosexuals among their ranks. The only “conservative” goals they seem to retain now are gutting social programs and protecting Israel. Many wealthy donors and elites switched sides to the Neoliberals as the tide shifted with Obama, but some remain, mostly those with a strong interest in Israel. The movement itself originates as a group of liberal Jewish intellectuals who broke with the left. It could be argued that their main purpose has been as insurance against a possible wholesale liberal abandonment of Israel in the future.
Hoi Polloi: Not many everyday Americans are actual Neo-conservatives anymore, conservative Whites merely accepted them as the only alternative to a more vocally hostile Left. The meteoric rise of Trump, his total defiance of the polls, was proof the Silent Majority was just waiting to throw them off for a better alternative. This group really only exist as an elite class of politicians, journalists, and influencers, with a few true-believers in the public hanging on. I’d imagine a number of high-ranking military personnel might define themselves as Neocons.
Demographics: White with very high Jewish over-representation and almost exclusively elites.
Growth Potential: Declining
Media Sample: National Review, Wall Street Journal, Front Page, heavy influence in conservative mainstream
Threat to White Interests: High, influence is waning but still could initiate anti-Trump coup. Consistently push for war. Aggressively pursuing Jewish interests. Support mass immigration.
Prominent Examples: Aside from Neocons, this group represents the majority of Republican politicians, e.g. Rand Paul. They are the old guard of conservatism who haven’t evolved into Nationalists and either actively oppose Trump, or grudgingly go along with him rather than collaborating with Neoliberals. They preach small government, low taxes, unrestricted free-trade, and most importantly, still support large scale immigration. Some go so far as to support amnesty for illegals, often citing the false narrative of America’s founding as a nation of immigrants. Most acknowledge the Muslim threat, but believe all immigrants, upon witnessing the majesty of American principles, will be inculcated with WASP values. Geopolitical stances vary, with some being more hawkish than others, while the majority oppose increasing security culture at the expense of civil liberties.
Hoi Polloi: Unlike Neocons, this group is still well represented among the masses. Post-Reagan and pre-Trump, they existed as little more than a heel for liberals, and fodder for the Neocons. It is composed of a coalition constitutionalists, libertarians (pre-nationalist), Reaganites, and some “Classical Liberals”. Predominantly Boomer, they believe the successful America they grew up in was the direct result of principles laid out in its founding, and not cultural or ethnic in origin. Most are members of cucked Christian churches that are only conservative on a handful of social issues, even Evangelicals could be described as such. Military and vets are drawn to this ideology out of a desire for their service to have meaning, but many are defecting to Nationalism. They believe minorities and immigrants are only anti-social and impoverished because of liberal policy, and if instructed in the values of conservatism, would flourish. They constituted the majority of the Never-Trump movement on the ground, though many supported him in the end for policy reasons, distaste for Neoliberal condescension, and the rise of Radicals.
Demographics: White over-representation, but would describe the majority of conservative minorities.
Growth Potential: Stagnant
Media Sample: Much of Fox News, The Federalist Papers
Threat to White Interests: Moderate, most would support anti-Trump coup and seek to wrest dominance back from Nationalists. Support mass immigration.
Prominent Examples: I only include the Alt-Lite as a group because its most well-known members like Mike Cernovich are media-friendly and have garnered a following and attention, albeit for their own opportunistic reasons. Though this group claims to be nationalist, it is a nationalism not based on racial, or even national, identity, but various propositions like “Western values”. As being a proposition-nation got us into this mess in the first place, these people would almost certainly lapse into Principlists and Neoconservatives if given any form of power. They exist primarily as a generic brand of the Alt-Right that is more easily digested by the mainstream by design.
Hoi Polloi: Proud Boys, Oatkeepers, An-Caps, YouTube skeptics, some “Classical Liberals”, and other disparate groups of millennials that stand opposed to mainstream conservatism, but vehemently oppose the Alt-Right, fall into this category. They are frustrated by manifestations of extreme leftism such as SJWs and PC culture, but usually do not seek out the root causes, instead opting to make 30-minute video critiques or fighting them in the street. Most are tolerant of deviant lifestyles and varying levels of immigration except Islamic. The causes of this are ideological, but also often result from their own engagement in deviant lifestyles, or identity as a minority with conservative beliefs. A great number of them also overlap with the conspiracy-sphere. Their refusal to answer the Jewish Question is a main point of departure from the Alt-Right.
Demographics: White with some minorities and Jews.
Growth Potential: Stagnant, possibly declining since the Rally Against Political Violence.
Media Sample: Heat Street, Danger & Play, Sargon of Akkad (Skeptics), Rubin Report, most of Rebel Media
Threat to White Interests: High, as the Alt-Right is the only group actively pursuing White interests, Alt-Lite dilution and confusion of their messaging is a major threat. Varying support for immigration.
Prominent Examples: Opponents of globalism fighting for sovereignty of their nations in Europe such as Nigel Farage and Marine Le Pen, undoubtedly inspired the rise of American nationalism. Trump began his run mostly in protest over personal grievances with the political system, but as he gained steam he brought Civic Nationalist Steve Bannon on to flesh out his policies. Despite his diminished influence in DC due to neocon meddling, Bannon represents what American conservatives want to see in government. Popular thinkers of this type are usually European, such as Mark Steyn, Paul Joseph Watson, etc. I’d put Ramzpaul in this category when he isn’t trying to lure kids into his van with blackpills.
Hoi Polloi: In America, white identity has been under threat longer than in most of Western Europe, thus American Nationalism has an implicit, if unconscious, racial motivation. This is about as far as right as boomers will allow themselves to go, and they make up a fair share of this group, as do Gen-X’ers and millennials. This label now defines the majority of White American conservatives. They believe in extremely limited immigration, protectionist trade policies, traditional social values, and usually want a small government with less regulation outside of trade. Many libertarians have adopted Nationalist immigration policies.
Resentment to the elite of Wall Street and DC is universal, with the prioritization of either dependent upon the Nationalist’s class and political background. Overwhelmingly working and middle class, with some sympathizers in the elite and chattering classes. Like the rest of conservatives, more and more military and vets have been defecting from the Principlists to become Nationalists. One of their main differences from the Alt-Lite is they rarely attack the Alt-Right, and usually only disavow strategically when pressed by the mainstream. This should be viewed as the main recruiting pool for Ethno-Nationalists.
Demographics: Over-representation of Whites, Males somewhat over=represented.
Growth Potential: Moderate
Media Sample: Tucker Carlson and Daily Caller, Breitbart, Lauren Southern, Info Wars (non-conspiracy)
Threat to White Interests: None, actively supporting, though not explicitly pursuing, White interests. Solid allies for the foreseeable future barring total Zionist co-opting.
Prominent Examples: This group’s origins are difficult to pin down, but a combination of Paleoconservative, race-realist journals, influence from the French New Right, and White Nationalist internet culture all coalesced into a movement of Ethno-Nationalism in America. Distinct from White Nationalism 1.0, the new brand of American Ethno-Nationalism has considerable reach with improved aesthetics, messaging, and effective spokesmen such as Richard Spencer, Kevin MacDonald, and Nathan Damigo. Several significant organizations exist within the movement. Adherents are for the most part willing to put aside economic and policy disputes for the sake of pursuing White interests. This is where a lot of the raw material of ideology used by other Nationalists is generated. The Jewish Question is almost universally accepted, with a few notable exceptions, whose statuses as White Nationalists are often questioned by more hard-line elements.
Hoi Polloi: Due to censorship it is difficult to tell just how big this movement is, but evidence points to it being surprisingly large. White Americans have been pushed a great deal by both Identitarians and Zionists for decades with little reprieve or chance to even complain, so the rise of the Alt-Right in popular culture has led to a renaissance of Ethno-Nationalism, with countless websites and writings being published, and even popular media and art being influenced. This group is dominated by Millennials and Gen-X, with some Boomer presence, and it seems to be catching on with Generation Z. Ethno-Nationalists skew middle class, with the anti-globalist working class leaning toward Nationalism or Radical Conservatism. Contrary to media-portrayal as anti-intellectual, Ethno-Nationalists tend to be well-educated and politically informed.
Demographics: Entirely White, overwhelmingly male.
Growth Potential: High
Media Sample: AltRight.com, Counter-Currents, Z Man Blog, Emily Youcis, American Renaissance, Occidental Dissent, Occidental Quarterly, Black Pigeon Speaks
Prominent Examples: Despite being a smaller aspect of the Nationalist movement, Radical Conservatives deserve mention for several reasons. Defiant of severe censorship efforts by the left, Radical Conservatives kept important ideas alive during Nationalism’s absence from the mainstream, and played a crucial role in their reintroduction and merging with paleconservatism. Groups like TradYouth, and websites like the Daily Stormer were pioneers of the Ethno-Nationalist movement, blazing a trail for the more prominent examples to follow, and developing effective tactics. This causes a lot of controversy as some new arrivals now wish to divorce Ethno-Nationalism of Radical Conservatism, and this can be seen as part of the reason behind the Alt-Lite schism. Dissenters argue the use of pre-WW II symbols linked to Fascist ideologies carry too much baggage, while Radical Conservatives argue that these symbols hold a timeless appeal to the White spirit. Whether younger generations share Boomers’ post-War baggage remains to be seen. This group also deserves attention because it is likely to grow significantly as multiculturalism and globalism worsen living conditions.
Hoi Polloi: As mentioned above, this is a small movement, largely due to the social stigma attached to their ideas despite the fact that very few advocate violence. This designation has more to do with specific political and social ideas that accompany its members’ White Nationalism, such as Radical-Traditionalism, National-Socialism and other schools of Fascism, Clericalism, and Ultra-Nationalism. Some members believe these political systems to be the only viable methods of securing White-continuity. Ideally, this group would be the vanguard of Ethno-Nationalism, pushing the boundaries of acceptable discourse, and participating in protests. This group’s age demographic is very hard to determine, but it is mostly working class, with some middle class adherents, including Whites who have experienced the worst aspects of diversity.
Demographics: Entirely White Male
Growth Potential: Moderate
Media Sample: Daily Stormer, TRS, Deconstructing Leftism, TWP,
Despite commendable efforts by some to shape this group into a cogent ideology, this designation best refers to an extremely loose coalition of radicals refusing to ally with Neoliberals against “fascists”, Left-leaning Trump supporters, economic leftists with centrist social beliefs, and race-realist liberals. Since their ideologies are so disparate I won’t try to list the specifics here, but anti-war and anti-Wall Street beliefs seem to be a common thread, and most disapprove of the Neoliberal Red Scare 2.0. Though some consider themselves fellow travelers with the Alt-Right, others believe they are the only alternative that can save the world from identity politics. The latter group wants to put a long escaped genie back in the bottle, while the former seem to just be resisting their inevitable “come to Jesus” moment with the Alt-Right. Still I personally won’t rule out the possibility that they could form some tractable movement down the line, and since most are honest and intelligent, they deserve some measure of patience.
Demographics: Mostly White, over-representation of males.
Growth Potential: Stagnant
Media Sample: Jacobin, The Intercept, WikiLeaks, Michael Tracey
Threat to White Interests: Difficult to foresee, probably little-to-none. The most tentative of allies, produce good journalism.
Prominent Examples: This designation covers everything from reptilians and flat-earthers, to the more tame Illuminati and NWO enthusiasts. While the former is mostly a minority good for a laugh, the latter is much bigger, and overlaps with more powerful and even mainstream ideologies. Most notably, Info Wars traffics in many of these theories and sells products based on them. Still, Info Wars does produce some legitimate journalism, calling out elites and rampant degeneration of Western culture. The Left often tries to use this wearing of two hats to discredit anyone who works for, watches, or cites Info Wars, but most reasonably intelligent adults can discern the difference between the outlet’s distinct markets. This could be viewed as opportunistic, since the counter-culture has shifted right, or as a genuine shift in ideology. Most likely it is a combination of both, as the realities of globalism lend themselves well to some of the speculative fantasies sites like Info Wars traffic in.
Hoi Polloi: A lot of Americans subscribe to conspiracy theories, and some very intelligent people dabble. With the vast networks of power at work in geopolitics, and extremely depressing realities just below the surface, the world of conspiracy offers simple and comforting answers. Of course, no one should be too smug in writing them off, as truth can be stranger than fiction, and as a hobby it does not necessarily negatively effect political and social beliefs. A lot of Right-Leaning Boomers and Gen-X’ers inhabit this world, though it doesn’t seem to be catching on with Millennials, as I believe they are only watching Info Wars for Nationalist content.
Demographics: Diverse, male over-representation
Growth Potential: Maintaining probably
Media Sample: Info-Wars (non-nationalist)
Threat to White Interests: Low to Moderate, arguably serves to discredit adjacent Nationalist ideologies and siphon off followers.
THE DISPOSSESSED AND DEPENDENT
A predominantly white underclass who have been rendered dependent upon the state through disability, chronic unemployment, and opioid dependence. Many of these people reside in rural, working class parts of the country like Appalachia and the South. Many are socially conservative, Nationalist, and even Libertarian, but remain fearful of Neocon and Principlist gutting of social welfare programs. If Trump caves too much to the conservative old-guard he could alienate this significant demographic. Disabled Veterans are somewhat safer from cuts, but the more sociopathic conservative politicians put their benefits on the table from time to time.
Please let me know any suggestions you have, anything I left out you feel should be included.
The Left-wing establishment has successfully outsourced the repression of political opposition to their constituents and the press.
As humans I think we are equipped with the remarkable ability to trick ourselves into believing a situation isn’t as bad as it truly is. Perhaps this is an evolutionary trait that allowed us to plan and sort out options in a crisis without becoming overwhelmed and shutting down. In modern society however, this characteristic is working against us.
There’s no doubt that if the US government instituted European-style hatespeech laws overnight, there’d be a raucous, if not violent, backlash. Thanks to what’s been coined as “lateral censorship”, however, the stripping back of the First Amendment in America has been much more subtle and insidious than European state-censorship. The term refers to the inflicting of social, career, and even physical consequences for unpopular speech, usually enforced by private institutions, peers, and most effectively, the press. Now, we are faced with as repressive an environment as Europe, possibly even worse off for the plausible deniability lateral censorship affords American liberals.
Ideally the threat of these consequences leads to self-censorship on issues of race, immigration, and Jewish nepotism, but as the fallout from multiculturalism, mass-immigration, and media silence on these issues increases, so does White desperation. As this desperation grows, more and more of us are willing to speak out both anonymously and openly.
Speaking out creates a sense of relief from the oppressive, seemingly daily defeats, where even our few victories face constant interference. Without this outlet, without the ability to blow off steam, it’s hard to say what the future will hold for political discourse in America. Apparently devolving back into neocons wouldn’t be enough anymore, as they are now getting the bullet too.
Leaving an armed population with fast-fading job prospects, it’s kids dying on Mexican dope, and European cousins dying by the thousands, with no ability to air grievances is a dangerous proposition.
In this instance CNN has made the excuse that finding the identity of HanAssHoleSolo falls within the scope of legitimate journalism. I’ve yet to see their equivocations regarding the threat to reveal it if he ever retracts his apology. The frustrating irony of this can be seen in the recent protestations of journalists against the barrage of “threats” they receive from an indignant public, the main difference being that CNN has the ability to make good on their’s. What CNN seems to be saying to the public here is, Might, or in their case, Wealth and good lawyers, Make Right.
If CNN is able to get away with this offence with no repercussions from the rest of the press, society-at-large, or the legal system, it will be a clear indication that lateral censorship is at least as effective as traditional censorship. Thus, every conservative should behave as if living in a totalitarian Marxist state, lest the intended surreptitious aspect of lateral censorship succeed.
There’s a lot to be lost if one were outed as a “racist”, or even as a Trump supporter in some circles, but everyone has a breaking point where the risk becomes worth it. I think we’re well past that breaking point, despite a massive, clandestine effort to present a false picture of American freedom to it’s White subjects. In my opinion the next mile-marker is where people will be ready to lay down their lives, and CNN just put their foot on the gas.
The fringe left and right are now duking it out publicly. Anyone with even a slight political bent will notice their facebook feeds filling up with videos and pictures of antifa packs colliding with mostly alt-light, ancap libtardarian types. It’s tempting to divine this explosion of violence and exposure as a reincarnation of the street fights between the National Socialists and Communists of Weimar Germany, but Unlike the National Socialists or Communists of the Weimar, our modern street warriors do not represent any concrete ideology or organization.
The reactionary street-soldiers of today are driven by an indistinct repulsion to the world vision the antifa punks and their sponsors represent. They are like an antibody of the nation, they represent the death rattle of sanity, a last cry from tradition, identity, and reason.
Wave after wave of humiliation has crashed upon our heads. They twist science into PC superstition and stare us in the face while doing so, as if to remind us they are powerful enough to turn the truth on its head in plain sight. Invading our homes and family through media and education was a blow we took quietly, but when the antifa shocktroops descended on those brave enough to speak out, it obviously became too much for some.
I respect everyone who has stood up to antifa. I’ve seen legitimate criticisms of Based Stick Man and the like, but nonetheless it is empowering and physically relieving to see tangible resistance, even if it amounts to little more than hospital bills and short-lived viral photos. These scuffles may seem trivial now, but they will be looked over someday when future generations try to discern what this global populist/nationalist struggle meant in the course of the evolution of civilization.
For now I think it is good for morale. Its good to see such passionate resistance to the existential threat of neoliberals and their far-left puppets, it makes the fight less despairing.
There are thousands of discussions, essays, articles, songs, and movies about the trials of “growing up _____”, but one that I have yet to see explored is the trial of growing up white in majority black neighborhoods, and black-run institutions. This is a unique position to be in as plenty of societies are split into two racial groups with one dominant and the other subservient, but very few societies (outside of South Africa) have switched roles in the recent past without destroying or expelling the defeated.
I personally lived in this world for a long time, throughout almost my entire adolescence and well into my twenties. At first it was a requirement of living in a very bad school district, and later economic restriction coupled with drug addiction. Obviously all personal experience is anecdotal, but so are anthropological studies, and viewing this experience as such is one way I’ve chosen to salvage this otherwise wasted period of my life. Also, I am not seeking to prove any greater statistical or sociological trend with my experience, but rather I seek to record and share a traumatic story I’ve yet to see catalogued elsewhere, so that others who have experienced it, and wrestled with the difficult racial lessons it teaches, may find internal peace, a strong white identity, and a path to worthwhile resistance, unlike those taken by a few whites lost in the madness (more on that below).
I started to the high school that would initiate my racial awakening sometime in my sophomore year, after moving from a much better school district to a district within the standard metropolitan public school system. The city school district where I live is a nightmare for anyone not lucky enough to get into one of the magnet schools, the rest are essentially outpatient prisons where black students are kept long enough to keep the crime rate down during the day. Despite their half-hearted efforts, up to one third of the school was truant at any given time, and I was no exception hoping to escape the brutal surroundings and retreat to the white suburbs with my friends and old classmates. When I did have to put in my mandatory days I was one out of ten or so white students in a school of thousands.
I was shoved into the walls daily simply for trying to walk to class, if I was ever in the stairwell where teachers and security were absent I was ganged up on and often threatened with being thrown down the diagonal concrete gauntlet, I survived my first jumping having my face bloodied by fresh leather Timberland boots. Every moment became a panic stricken trial of getting from one place to the other without being seen, and eventually retreating to hidden refuges with the other white kids, or leaving campus together. I secretly studied boxing and went to the gym in an effort to defend myself, but they never attacked anyone alone, it was always in greater numbers, and no semblance of sportsmanship existed among them.
To make matters worse my father, who was a Jewish liberal, along with my then-absent mother, had worked tirelessly my whole life to ensure I absorbed their values and regarded race as an abstract that “didn’t really exist anyway” and my pleas to change the situation fell on deaf ears. The implanted wheels in my brain spun to weave explanations such as the ones picking on me were just assholes, or I somehow deserved it, but reality tore those to shreds as I knew every white kid at school (except the women, they’d been successfully ghettoized and taken as trophies who equally hated white males) was receiving the same punishment, even the ones who dressed and acted black. And the former made no sense either as there were no bullies in the traditional sense as seen on TV. Violence emerged from throngs in the hallways or small gatherings in corners like lightning strikes with no discernable origin or meaning, and receded with the same abruptness, soon fading into laughter and eerily calm behavior.
So what could it be? I asked myself tirelessly. A less brainwashed racial specimen would spend their days formulating a solution, or revenge, but a racially-guilt wracked half-jew son of a communist wondered about what he could have done better, I pondered if I deserved it for all of the past suffering of the Trans-Atlantic slave trade. It didn’t take more than a few months for that decade’s worth of propaganda to fade, it’s amazing what a few kicks to the face can do to jog your genetic memory.
Eventually pure hatred filled my gut, I wasn’t reading statistics about black crime, or Mein Kampf, or buying Doc Martins, I was dreaming up scenarios of revenge, I was seeing their twisted sneers as the faces of primates, I was watching their behavior with revulsion, and hearing their laughter like the calls of beasts. I was filled with pure genetic dread and loathing. I was somewhere I was not meant to be because some hippies in the sixties thought they could override nature, that was the extent of my intellectual opinion on the matter, the rest was in my bones and in my burning adolescent blood every time I had to go to school. I kept these rough racial realizations hidden from the world of my past, my friends, my parents, but the other white kids at school all shared it in glances, looks of disgust at loud outbursts, and the occasional “niggers” spoken breathlessly between grit teeth, crowded around our table at lunch. It’s a miracle I made it out without something horrible happening before I finally dropped out after my Junior year.
For the latter years of my adolescence I tried to put those feelings behind me and return to the comfort of suburban rebellion with my friends, but certain wounds remained unclosed as I spent time in juvenile lock-up and black-run detention/rehab centers. I watched black authority figures give egregiously unfair treatment to their racial kin amongst my ranks. They turned blind eyes to my beatings, and seemed to take joy in the suffering of whites in their care. Every time I returned to my upper-middle class friends, I found them increasingly liberalized, to the point of being radical socialists and anarchists despite their affluent roots. They would go on tirades against the racist white world while I sat in knowing silence.
I did my best to smooth over the jagged edges left from my personal racial struggle in order to still fit in, and for the most part I was able to, with a few notable exceptions. I abhorred rap, and secretly hated myself when listening to it with them, and still more I hated their adoption of black dialects and behavior. This internal struggle lasted well into my twenties until several intensely violent conflicts while I was in active addiction, living in majority black neighborhoods, finally shook my subconscious racial awareness into my waking mind and recalled and amplified the only thing I had learned in high school: Race is Real, and it Matters.
I eventually got clean, and took the most important step toward white racial consciousness, I got away from majority, or even large minority, black areas. The next step was getting closer with a real life person who had long embraced white identity. For the first time in my life, I was able openly discuss my racial experiences, and better still, I was assured they were shared and real by a person I greatly respected. We exchanged information we dug up, freely developing new and exciting ideas about politics, the future, and our personal racial well-being. Having a real, living human, a friend or loved one to openly discuss these truths with does more than a million blogs, books, or websites could ever do.
Next, over the course of several years I found the voices of the “far-right” (before the Alt-Right had a name) that spoke to me and accrued a list of my own personal favorites as a library of information and inspiration. Just as important was building a collection of both overt and inherently white art, such as music, film, and literature from which I drew great pride in my heritage. From these voices, both past and present, I was given a much more coherent map of a possible future, and a definite course of action. I learned when to expend my energy, and when to save it. I was also given the courage to speak out, if only in fragments at first. I am also extremely lucky to be alive and learning just as the movement is growing, and though it may be too soon to tell, moving out into the open.
People like Dylann Roof lived in this world I grew up in, in a dark place cut off from all support and truth. He saw hard evidence of a collapsing multicultural society in front of him, and if his story was anything like mine, he became collateral damage of the fallout, suffering real physical and psychological harm. He found pieces of truth buried in the internet while everyone else around him ignored or actively suppressed it, but there was no one around to help him put these pieces together into a cohesive map of ideas, identity, and most importantly a path to action. Instead he reacted like so many others exposed to a truth the rest of the world denies, he lashed out hoping to tear open the fabric of the great lie and find some potent truth on the other side. He mistakenly sought an outright racial war, in the hopes of laying bare the hidden conflict he had uncovered, rallying the imaginary allies from the shadows he so desperately longed for. Regardless of his intentions, he found only indignation from the masses, (rightful) distancing from the allies he’d hoped for, and life in a majority black prison where he has already endured many beatings.
Without guidance Roof leaped to a conclusion NO white identitarian supports, but there are so few voices out there for the white youth due to suppression and censorship by the left, that Roof was left with only disconnected fragments to build his own twisted course of action. He was a product of the great lie and its army of censures, not the few truths he managed to unearth. So I offer up my experience in the hopes that other young whites caught up in this world Roof and I shared might find a friendly, understanding voice, and realize that white identity is about the opposite world of our enemies. It is a world of enlightenment, logic, beauty, and strength applied in the right directions, at the right moments, and hopefully, someday it can ultimately be about peace.
For a joyful moment I thought perhaps, after Trump’s victory, his supporters would be offered respite and vindication. Neither has happened, in the media or the rest of the country.
A few news outlets have offered up token sentiments along the lines of, “We got it wrong”. The New York Times even went so far as to admit their bias and the damage it caused to their reputation, though this is more likely the result their declining readership and profits than some moral revelation.
Around the bottom floors of their skyscraper office, throngs of protesters surged through the streets, burning effigies of the president elect alongside American flags. The irony that Trump and Giuliani’s hard work in the eighties made those streets safe enough for white hipsters to protest in, was certainly lost in the clamor.
It won’t be much different if Trump improves their quality of life. The left will blame him every time a black man is shot, and reblog every self-inflicted hate crime scrawled on dorm room doors by attention seeking transsexuals. The entirety of the left, especially millennials, would prefer serfdom under a plutocrat, as long as she is still nice to Muslims every time they blow something up.
I don’t think we expected unity or healing. If anyone knows our nation is long past that point, it’s White Nationalists, but I expected a concession of sorts. An acknowledgement that the left had tipped its hand, and left the silent-majority out in the cold in favor of their new demographic pets.
The left codified concepts like white-privilege into the political, corporate, and media establishment, hastening the decline of white power in order to clear a path for non-whites. All they asked for in return were votes.
Well it seems blacks and Hispanics did not hold up their end of the bargain well enough to squelch the white reaction, and now it’s quite clear that there was no plan B. Their rage-induced convulsions are proof-positive that liberals have zero desire to reorient their coalition to once again include working class whites.
They didn’t want us co-opted, they didn’t want us maligned, they didn’t even want us scared. They wanted us gone, and with Hillary in office they could have opened the floodgates and ensured our votes never amounted to anything more than a death rattle.
That’s not what happened, though, is it? Now Trump can stop the left’s plan dead in its tracks, and even reverse their half-century of demographic engineering. They’ve literally lost everything, and are going to throw tantrums big enough to break a lot of things, such as the media, Hollywood, and academia. If these institutions continue on as they have since the small hours of November 9th, their credibility will never recover in the eyes of normal whites.
Hopefully this means we get to rebuild them.
Most conservatives, and a few apprehensive liberals, are cognizant of the fact that America’s news media skews left of center, save the neocon flagship, Fox News, and a smattering of rogue websites. Nonetheless, targeted messages on issues such as gun control or amnesty were usually limited to one or two networks at a time, mostly in short bursts of coverage cloaked among otherwise legitimate journalism. During election years plenty of outlets and journalists have had their favored candidates, but moral absolutes were most often reserved for the pundits and opinion columns. This year however, as outsider populists from either party’s “fringe” made significant gains during the primaries, it became clear that coverage of the 2016 election cycle was rapidly diverging from journalism, into public relations.
An efficacious force behind the scenes was brazenly mobilizing the media in support of establishment candidates on either side during the primaries, and later Hillary in the general. It was easy enough to put a face on this force through common sense and a quick look at the establishment candidates’ major contributors. The elite, both domestic and international, had chosen their defenders of the status quo, Hillary Clinton for the Democrats, and practically anyone not named Trump for the GOP. As Sanders was dispatched by his own party’s national committee in the primaries and Trump defied all logic by trouncing his way to the GOP nomination, the board was set for this struggle to continue into the general, with the vast majority of the influence cartel, even former GOP supporters, aligning behind Clinton.
Still, a millionaire’s reasons for wanting to smash Donald J. Trump, such as protecting globalism, were not exactly relatable to the average voter. Thus, his opponents, from Washington to Brussels, raised the absurd concern that his populism was a crude form of fascism, hoping their dog-whistle would perk up the ears of a population raised on anti-racist rhetoric since grade school. As part of the wealthy intelligentsia who regarded racism as gauche, journalists were game to spread this message to the masses (celebrities followed suit soon after), and the fears of globalists were disguised as an urgent terror the low information voter could understand.
The sheer level of consistency across news outlets, and the quick spread of their message to the minds and timelines of voters, begs the question, how was it all pulled together? The Wikileaks releases thus far scratch the surface of presumable media collusion. It’s now known that members of the Clinton campaign referred to a certain journalist working for the venerable AP as a “friendly”. Other journalists from such disparate outlets as the New York Times, to Louise Mensch at Heat Street, sent fawning messages regarding Hillary’s staff, while some went so far as to run their articles past them, taking suggestions for edits, teeing up interviews, and asking permission to use quotes. Perhaps the most damning, and certainly the most relevant, email of all was the one containing a proposed guest list for Joe Podesta’s private “Off the Record Dinner”, which included a who’s who of the 4th Estate, from NPR to Buzzfeed. It’s hard to imagine what purpose this dinner served outside of collusion between the Clinton Campaign and the press. At the very least, it may have given high-level campaign operatives a chance to test the ethical flexibility of the journalists who attended.
While poring over the names of the most vehemently anti-Trump journalists, it is difficult to overlook the recurrence of Jewish surnames. In terms of reactions to Trump, theirs has been the most rabidly negative, in all spheres of consequence. A neurosis regarding nationalism, or “authoritarianism” as they diagnosis it, has been a hallmark of the Jewish collective subconscious since Rome conquered Judea. In more recent history, one need only look back to the witch hunt carried out by Jewish Journalists against Charles Lindbergh when he dared to oppose America’s impending involvement in the 2nd World War. Much as it did then, this idiosyncratic Jewish neurosis has spilled over into the mainstream on a surreal scale. Article after article has been dedicated to comparing Trump to Hitler, while also paradoxically comparing the invading Muslim hordes he wishes to stop, to their Jewish ancestors in Nazi Germany. The fact that the Jew’s neurotic attitude toward nationalism has been so successfully grafted onto the minds of White Americans is probably the most troubling revelation of the 2016 election thus far.
Trump himself said it best when he elucidated, “the mainstream media has poisoned the minds of the people”. Their psychological venom has had a deep and lasting effect on the mental stability of Trump’s opposition, while simultaneously demoralizing his supporters. For decades the Democratic machine had played the racial animus of minorities against the larger white society, but by painting Trump as an existential threat, they’ve added accelerant to an already roaring fire, thus inducing nearly half the country into a collective insanity. Not only have Trump’s rallies been besieged by crowds of aggressive Mexicans and their gallant, liberal white handlers, a GOP headquarters has now been firebombed, and others vandalized. By calling the legitimate concerns of nativist voters “evil” or “dangerous”, the elites and their allegiant media have eroded the already crumbling foundations of democracy, namely the dignity of all voters. Once white liberals were convinced of their opponents’ inhumanity, they were willing to let their black and Hispanic pets off the leash.
The need to defeat Trump at all costs was nowhere taken more seriously than among the rank and file of the Democratic apparatus, including its shadowy network of contractors and consultants. Surely it is easy enough for the elites to wade through such unethical swamps with little to no justification, but for the foot soldiers to cross their personal moral boundaries they likely required rationalizations due to their pesky remnants of a conscience. Undoubtedly, the media’s relentless narrative of Trump’s role as a semi-fascist demagogue helped gently carry them over those personal barriers and permitted these Democratic operatives to concoct and execute plans for massive fraud, and worse still, orchestrate large-scale outbreaks of violence at Trump rallies.
As the corruption of leftist insiders was laid bare in the blazing light of video evidence by Project Veritas, Hillary’s supporters’ new fear-based loyalty was put to the ultimate test. Would they, when faced with evidence directly proving a subversion of democracy, still support such an anti-democratic apostle of the globalist synagogue ? The answer was a resounding “yes”. While Trump faced spiraling numbers for his “locker room talk”, the revelations of Project Veritas had virtually no impact on Hillary’s support. Her surrogates on the campaign trail, her “friendlies” in the media, voters on social media, and even the candidate herself all refused to even acknowledge the evidence. The campaign of agitation against Trump had succeeded so thoroughly that not even the most heinous transgressions against democracy in American history could obstruct Hillary’s ascent to power.
Those few who would deign to acknowledge the videos’ existence, labelled its acquisition illegal (sound familiar?), as the footage was gathered via O’Keefe’s exceptional investigative journalism, which included trespassing, impersonation, and other such tactics. Others simply claimed the video was selectively edited, as Democrats had with O’Keefe’s previous investigations, despite the fact that each subject of his investigation was rather explicit in their admissions (especially Scott Foval); several of them were also summarily terminated within a day of the videos’ release further proving its authenticity. Thanks again to the media’s overpowering depiction of Trump as a dybbuk, millions of voters were just as willing to abandon their morals as the conspirators themselves had been.
In a cruel twist of irony President Barrack Obama has stated multiple times that Donald J. Trump deals exclusively in fear, and prattles on at length about the disastrous results of his demagoguery if Trump were to take his place. Unfortunately the damage wrought by Obama and his ilk is not hypothetical, and the consequences of their rhetoric may persist well past election-day, no matter who wins. If Hillary wins with a reasonably wide margin (despite defrauding the electorate in the primary), this shameless manipulation will expedite white acceptance of the looming uniparty, already made possible by the left’s demographic rigging. If she wins through fraud, a disenfranchised electorate will have no choice but to challenge the entire democratic system, possibly bringing it to a savage halt. In either case a freshly empowered left will be free to persecute conservative whites whom they will no doubt view as racist insurrectionists, and as the Veritas Videos have shown, the liberal establishment is already willing to use violence as a political tool. The best we can hope for is a Trump win with a country split in twain. At least in this scenario, the man at the helm will place law and order above chaos and revenge. He will have the support of police and in turn protect them from race-hustlers, empowering them to properly protect law-abiding citizens once more. Most importantly, he will be on our side.
Hillary’s personal fixations on the global landscape have become part and parcel of her policies, such as good ol’ Russia, or the Alt-Right, a fringe internet movement, and now Julian Assange for crossing her. While Donald Trump may devote a sizable portion of his speaking time to personal battles, he has not threatened war over them, or implied his critics were part of a geopolitical conspiracy w/ foreign governments. Just recently, Hillary threatened to use “military resources” against the Russians if they happen to be blamed for a cyber-attack against the US, citing the DNC hack as an example of Ruskie villainy .
Despite Clinton’s sabre rattling, Trump is still the candidate the media portrays as unhinged. Hours of airtime on the 24 hour networks are spent dissecting Donald Trump’s tweets, speeches, and even body language, all to prove how dangerous he would be in possession of the fabled “button”. Meanwhile, Clinton’s foreign policy reads like a Tom Clancy novel; hackers working for the Russian government are attempting to rig an election, while seeding a revolutionary nationalist movement on social media. As war-weary as Americans are, having lost so many loved ones, you think we would have developed a better immunity to this shit, but Clinton has ingratiated herself to the public through demographic pandering, co-opting a lite version Bernie’s radical economic reforms, and the sheer force of her political connections and power.
I’m about 30 years old and I have never seen a political candidate with so much open contempt for the public, with such a brazen hunger for power, be so successful. Her total insulation from a press with kid’s gloves stitched to their wrists, while hacking up her lungs or making outrageous gaffes, is enough to explain the abysmally low trust Americans have in the media. Even if someone is voting for Hillary, I assume most would be aware that the media has mobilized behind her in total, even satirists and late-night hosts. Most liberal Americans, at least the ones honest enough to admit media bias, would leverage Trump’s racism or nationalist tendencies in defense of a Clinton-friendly media, stating perhaps, that he is a threat to the liberal values journalism itself is founded upon. This is at least the argument I heard on NPR when a panel of journalists from such ideologically disparate publications as Huffington Post, Buzzfeed, and the New York Times, dissected and justified their critical views on DJT, fancying themselves as modern day Murrows.
What about Clinton’s political network of intimidation, bribery, international subterfuge, regime change, etc. etc.? Her criminal career is so prolific as to make leaps and bounds beyond the hopes and dreams of a prison full of RICO statute violators. It stretches across oceans and continents, leaving civil wars, assassinations, and mass migrations in its wake. A few brave souls sift through the wreckage of her crimes, only to watch her outmaneuver every new revelation before subsequently destroying their lives, and possibly ending them.
Colin Powell’s recently leaked emails tell of her hubris and crass, self-serving world view. Still, this evidence, like the rest, will amount to no harm for her campaign. Trump will still be viewed as the more dangerous candidate because he dared to propose that a judge’s national origin may affect his views on immigration, or because he said mean things to women. For middle class, college educated whites mostly voting for Clinton, a potentially racist or sexist president might truly be worse than another war. At the very least, they are willing to take that gamble. Many of them even idolize Clinton. Plenty of popular television shows have had her on in a positive, usually feminist, light. While famous millennial yentas trot her out, attempting to render her into a more human form, they look on with ga-ga eyes at the pantsuit marvel who can wreak havoc upon the proles just like a man can. For these reasons, coupled with her demographic support, no matter how hawkish Clinton may turn, during her candidacy or presidency, and no matter how dovish Trump may be in comparison, she will enjoy broad support from traditionally anti-war voters, who probably still view themselves as humanitarian exemplars.